|
TabGroupAs farms increase in size and intensity, agricultural pollution is gaining a new urgency across Canada. The response from most environmental groups and from upper levels of government is generally to push for more centralized regulation. The effect has often been to disempower directly affected individuals and communities – with the perverse result of more rather than less agricultural pollution.
In Greener Pastures: Decentralizing the Regulation of Agricultural Pollution (published in 2007 by the University of Toronto's Centre for Public Management), Environment Probe examines the environmental harm caused by provincial regulation – especially right-to-farm laws – and advocates returning decision-making authority to the local level.
Environment Probe is also a critic of agricultural subsidies – including programs that pay farmers not to pollute. Paying farmers not to pollute defies a widely accepted economic principle at the heart of environmental sustainability – the need to internalize the costs of pollution, or to make pollution prevention part of the cost of farming.
TabGroup2
|
|
|
|
This important book builds on earlier work by the same author, Property Rights in the Defence of Nature (1995), which made a strong case that customary common law in the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada has been an effective means of pollution control, where and when it has been allowed to work. As that earlier book showed, however, legislative law, often drawn up on the premise that it would promote economic progress or the public good, has often weakened these customary common law remedies to air and water pollution.
This new book applies the same analytical lens to the narrower issue of air and water pollution originating on farms. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"What does Environment Probe gain by this display of disunity?" demanded one farmer. His anger, voiced in a letter to the Ontario Farmer newspaper, was directed at our public rebuke of the new Ontario ALUS Alliance, a coalition pushing for a provincially funded program that would pay farmers to provide environmentally friendly "alternative land use services." His organization, a local of the National Farmers Union of Ontario, fears that a debate over the program's merits could jeopardize its public funding. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The new Ontario ALUS Alliance proposes incentives rather than regulations to encourage farmers to protect the environment. The Alliance's market friendly rhetoric obscures its reliance on tools that are antithetical to markets: taxpayer subsidies and violations of rural residents' property rights. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As researchers in the field of agri-food studies turn their attention to the institutional mechanisms that enable industrial agri-food systems to persist in spite of their ecological contradictions, environmental regulation is likely to become an increasingly important topic. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In her review of Greener Pastures: Decentralizing the Regulation of Agricultural Pollution, Harriet Friedmann is right to insist that not all agricultural pollution can be addressed by restoring rural residents’ rights to challenge agricultural nuisances in court. As Friedmann explains, “to hang the solution to agricultural pollution on courts responding to complaints by neighbours seems wildly inadequate.... [Neighbours] cannot be expected to take responsibility for wider problems that affect whole societies, watersheds, and bioregions.” read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A seven-year mystery about the contamination of well-water in Walkerton, Ontario was solved for me in Elizabeth Brubaker’s very first paragraph. I recall good media reports when it happened in 2000 about the livestock operations that were a possible source of the bacteria which caused illness and death to citizens of the town. Yet the livestock operations faded from view as the public inquiry turned the spotlight on government inspections. Brubaker’s treatise on agricultural pollution begins with a paradoxical finding of the Walkerton Inquiry ---- that pollution of wells came from manure which had been spread on farm fields in accordance with provincial regulations. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A new book takes aim at right-to-farm legislation, arguing that relying on the creation of common law through court decisions would result in fewer disputes and would make polluting farmers responsible to their communities. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the passage of a new Planning Act last month, Manitoba's NDP government furthered its 33-year campaign to foist factory farms on an unwilling public, ensuring that neither individual property rights nor the desires of a local community can stop large farm operations that create nuisances or pollute the environment. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic chaos again disrupted Toronto yesterday as convoys of tractors – in the second such demonstration in as many weeks – converged on Queen's Park to demand more privileges for farmers. Last week, 8,000 farmers organized by the Ontario Federation of Agriculture lined up at the legislative trough for cash. Yesterday's protesters, led by the Lanark Landowners' Association, demanded a different kind of subsidy: freedom from accountability. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last month, 150 residents of Ashburn, Ont., filed a civil lawsuit against Greenwood Mushroom Farms, claiming the stench from the farm has created a nuisance. Thanks to a provincial law designed to promote agriculture, the judge hearing the case will have to consider not whether GMF's operations are harmful but whether they are "normal" – a standard that defies economics and undermines the property rights of all rural residents. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Friday, in a national "day of action" against factory farming, rural Canadians denounced the giant feedlots, mega hog barns and concentrated poultry operations that increasingly threaten their health and well-being. While demonstrators in Saskatchewan and Ontario called for provincial moratoriums on the hog industry's expansion, activists in Alberta and Manitoba cut to the heart of the matter, insisting on local control over the siting of livestock operations. Their demands point to an often-overlooked fact: In robbing Canadians of their property rights, heavy-handed provincial legislators have brought us factory farms. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Subsidizing farmers has backfired in Canada," says Lawrence Solomon, one of the authors of a report released last week by the Urban Renaissance institute, which is a division of Toronto environmental group Energy Probe. Energy Probe is also affiliated with Environment Probe, an organization which recently sent out a fundraising letter slamming Ontario's farmers for polluting the environment, living off the avails of subsidies, and hiding behind exemptions in environmental protection laws. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Toronto-based environmental group has sent out fundraising letters to people who supported it and its partner organizations in the past, criticizing Ontario's farmers for "threaten(ing) both human health and the environment," for "enjoy(ing) special status under the law," and for accepting economic subsidies which "discriminat(e) against responsible small-scale farms." read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When it comes to polluting, farmers shouldn't be treated any differently from industry, the Walkerton inquiry heard yesterday. Among the experts at the public hearing in Toronto was Elizabeth Brubaker of the Energy Probe Research Foundation. Farmers treated like industrialists, she said, would have to bear the cost of preventing pollution on their land. When it comes to polluting, farmers shouldn't be treated any differently from industry, the Walkerton inquiry heard yesterday. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"What farmers facing environmental restrictions have suspected about provincial urban sewages systems is true: they are massive environmental polluters of sewage and other compounds. Because it would cost so much to upgrade facilities in cities and towns, the situation often gets a blind eye."
It took just a few minutes. A manure irrigation gun, left unattended, pumping at full throttle. A faulty connection. Before anyone knew what had happened, several thousand litres of liquid hog manure were flowing down the slope towards the small trout creek. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
View All Articles
TabGroup3
TabGroup
|
|
|
|
Some food consumers, in an effort to contribute to environmental stewardship, are choosing to eat food produced closer to home. How does this practice stack up, environmentally? read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environment Probe turned 20 this year. To our surprise and delight, we also learned this year that our foundation maintains Canada's most popular environmental web site. The reason, we suspect, is that the public doesn't like top-down environmentalism, and we have the field of community-based, market-oriented environmentalism pretty well to ourselves. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A brief reference to Microbial Source Tracking appears in the Annual Report on Drinking Water released last week by Ontario's Minister of the Environment. Researchers using this exciting new technology recently identified agriculture as the dominant source of E. coli in southeastern Lake Huron. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"What does Environment Probe gain by this display of disunity?" demanded one farmer. His anger, voiced in a letter to the Ontario Farmer newspaper, was directed at our public rebuke of the new Ontario ALUS Alliance, a coalition pushing for a provincially funded program that would pay farmers to provide environmentally friendly "alternative land use services." His organization, a local of the National Farmers Union of Ontario, fears that a debate over the program's merits could jeopardize its public funding. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The new Ontario ALUS Alliance proposes incentives rather than regulations to encourage farmers to protect the environment. The Alliance's market friendly rhetoric obscures its reliance on tools that are antithetical to markets: taxpayer subsidies and violations of rural residents' property rights. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This paper describes the development of right-to-farm legislation in British Columbia and examines the decisions of the board established to hear complaints about agricultural nuisances. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Livestock are one of the most significant contributors to today's most serious environmental problems." That warning, issued by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, couldn't be clearer. Farmers around the globe are polluting the air, degrading the land, and fouling the water on a "massive scale," the FOA charged. "Urgent action is required to remedy the situation." read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In her review of Greener Pastures: Decentralizing the Regulation of Agricultural Pollution, Harriet Friedmann is right to insist that not all agricultural pollution can be addressed by restoring rural residents’ rights to challenge agricultural nuisances in court. As Friedmann explains, “to hang the solution to agricultural pollution on courts responding to complaints by neighbours seems wildly inadequate.... [Neighbours] cannot be expected to take responsibility for wider problems that affect whole societies, watersheds, and bioregions.” read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This paper outlines the provincial laws that exempt farmers from liability for the nuisances they create. It describes the new standard of "normalcy" by which agricultural practices are often measured and examines the farm practice review boards that have been established to determine whether disputed practices are normal, and thus acceptable.
read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Elizabeth Brubaker. This book traces the evolution of laws permitting farms to grow larger and to create nuisances -- especially odours -- that harm their neighbours. It argues for a return to a more decentralized, rights-based regulatory regime in which individuals and communities are empowered to protect themselves from polluting farms. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our water and our air are under siege, and our governments are doing precious little to protect them. Warnings have been sounded by two of Canada's most prominent environmental watchdogs. Together, they demonstrate the pressing need for a new approach to environmental protection. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A presentation to Property Rights, Economics, and Environment: Land Resources, an international conference organised by the Centre d'Analyse Economique Environnement and the International Centre for Research on Environmental Issues. The conference took place in Aix-en-Provence, France, on June 26-28, 2006. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A speech to the Annual Conference of the Alberta Agricultural Economics Association, held in Red Deer, Alberta, on May 4, 2006. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the passage of a new Planning Act last month, Manitoba's NDP government furthered its 33-year campaign to foist factory farms on an unwilling public, ensuring that neither individual property rights nor the desires of a local community can stop large farm operations that create nuisances or pollute the environment. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada's powerful farm lobbies would have you believe that farmers operate under too many rules. The Ontario Federation of Agriculture complains of a "multitude" of unjustified laws and regulations, while the BC Agriculture Council lobbies for a "real reduction of regulation." read more »
|
|
|
|
|
View All Publications
TabGroup2Books, Studies and Reports
|
|
|
|
This paper describes the development of right-to-farm legislation in British Columbia and examines the decisions of the board established to hear complaints about agricultural nuisances. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This paper outlines the provincial laws that exempt farmers from liability for the nuisances they create. It describes the new standard of "normalcy" by which agricultural practices are often measured and examines the farm practice review boards that have been established to determine whether disputed practices are normal, and thus acceptable.
read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Elizabeth Brubaker. This book traces the evolution of laws permitting farms to grow larger and to create nuisances -- especially odours -- that harm their neighbours. It argues for a return to a more decentralized, rights-based regulatory regime in which individuals and communities are empowered to protect themselves from polluting farms. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPRF's presentation to the Walkerton Inquiry's Public Hearing on Specific Sources of Contaminants recommends that farmers bear the full costs of preventing pollution from their operations. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
View All Books, Studies and Reports
TabGroup3
|
|
|
|
"What does Environment Probe gain by this display of disunity?" demanded one farmer. His anger, voiced in a letter to the Ontario Farmer newspaper, was directed at our public rebuke of the new Ontario ALUS Alliance, a coalition pushing for a provincially funded program that would pay farmers to provide environmentally friendly "alternative land use services." His organization, a local of the National Farmers Union of Ontario, fears that a debate over the program's merits could jeopardize its public funding. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The new Ontario ALUS Alliance proposes incentives rather than regulations to encourage farmers to protect the environment. The Alliance's market friendly rhetoric obscures its reliance on tools that are antithetical to markets: taxpayer subsidies and violations of rural residents' property rights. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In her review of Greener Pastures: Decentralizing the Regulation of Agricultural Pollution, Harriet Friedmann is right to insist that not all agricultural pollution can be addressed by restoring rural residents’ rights to challenge agricultural nuisances in court. As Friedmann explains, “to hang the solution to agricultural pollution on courts responding to complaints by neighbours seems wildly inadequate.... [Neighbours] cannot be expected to take responsibility for wider problems that affect whole societies, watersheds, and bioregions.” read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the passage of a new Planning Act last month, Manitoba's NDP government furthered its 33-year campaign to foist factory farms on an unwilling public, ensuring that neither individual property rights nor the desires of a local community can stop large farm operations that create nuisances or pollute the environment. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic chaos again disrupted Toronto yesterday as convoys of tractors – in the second such demonstration in as many weeks – converged on Queen's Park to demand more privileges for farmers. Last week, 8,000 farmers organized by the Ontario Federation of Agriculture lined up at the legislative trough for cash. Yesterday's protesters, led by the Lanark Landowners' Association, demanded a different kind of subsidy: freedom from accountability. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last month, 150 residents of Ashburn, Ont., filed a civil lawsuit against Greenwood Mushroom Farms, claiming the stench from the farm has created a nuisance. Thanks to a provincial law designed to promote agriculture, the judge hearing the case will have to consider not whether GMF's operations are harmful but whether they are "normal" – a standard that defies economics and undermines the property rights of all rural residents. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Friday, in a national "day of action" against factory farming, rural Canadians denounced the giant feedlots, mega hog barns and concentrated poultry operations that increasingly threaten their health and well-being. While demonstrators in Saskatchewan and Ontario called for provincial moratoriums on the hog industry's expansion, activists in Alberta and Manitoba cut to the heart of the matter, insisting on local control over the siting of livestock operations. Their demands point to an often-overlooked fact: In robbing Canadians of their property rights, heavy-handed provincial legislators have brought us factory farms. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
View All Articles
TabGroup4
|
|
|
|
A presentation to Property Rights, Economics, and Environment: Land Resources, an international conference organised by the Centre d'Analyse Economique Environnement and the International Centre for Research on Environmental Issues. The conference took place in Aix-en-Provence, France, on June 26-28, 2006. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A speech to the Annual Conference of the Alberta Agricultural Economics Association, held in Red Deer, Alberta, on May 4, 2006. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
View All Speeches
TabGroup5
|
|
|
|
Environment Probe turned 20 this year. To our surprise and delight, we also learned this year that our foundation maintains Canada's most popular environmental web site. The reason, we suspect, is that the public doesn't like top-down environmentalism, and we have the field of community-based, market-oriented environmentalism pretty well to ourselves. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Livestock are one of the most significant contributors to today's most serious environmental problems." That warning, issued by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, couldn't be clearer. Farmers around the globe are polluting the air, degrading the land, and fouling the water on a "massive scale," the FOA charged. "Urgent action is required to remedy the situation." read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our water and our air are under siege, and our governments are doing precious little to protect them. Warnings have been sounded by two of Canada's most prominent environmental watchdogs. Together, they demonstrate the pressing need for a new approach to environmental protection. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada's powerful farm lobbies would have you believe that farmers operate under too many rules. The Ontario Federation of Agriculture complains of a "multitude" of unjustified laws and regulations, while the BC Agriculture Council lobbies for a "real reduction of regulation." read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several weeks ago, a resident of Langley, BC, wrote to me about a duck fattening farm that made her community miserable. The stench of manure from up to 10,000 ducks nauseated neighbours, drove customers away from local businesses, and exposed children to ridicule at school. Neighbours blamed asthma attacks and other health problems on fumes from the farm. They also feared that the farm's manure storage system threatened local water supplies. After four years of battling the farm, despite some victories along the way, many local residents remain concerned. They know they can't count on the provincial government to protect their health and well being - indeed, it has bent over backwards to promote intensive farming. And so they have turned to the courts to continue their fight to keep factory farms out of their community. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should hog farmers be allowed to create odours so foul that they make neighbours physically ill? Should cattle farmers who follow manure-management rules be exempt from local bylaws limiting their size and density? Should vegetable farmers be allowed to send clouds of black dust across neighbouring lands, or awaken neighbours throughout the night with cannon explosions designed to scare away wildlife? How much pollution is "necessary" or "acceptable," and who should decide? read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earlier this year, several days after a lengthy interview with a writer for a weekly news magazine, I received a puzzled e-mail. "How would you describe yourself politically?" the writer asked. "Do you lean towards the left or the right?" read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Treat farming like any other industry and clean it up, inquiry urged." So read the headline of a Toronto Star article about one of our presentations to the Walkerton Inquiry. Our approach was considered newsworthy, but it shouldn't have been. After all, isn't it just common sense that we need to start cracking down on pollution from farms? read more »
|
|
|
|
|
View All Campaigns
TabGroup6
|
|
|
|
Some food consumers, in an effort to contribute to environmental stewardship, are choosing to eat food produced closer to home. How does this practice stack up, environmentally? read more »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A brief reference to Microbial Source Tracking appears in the Annual Report on Drinking Water released last week by Ontario's Minister of the Environment. Researchers using this exciting new technology recently identified agriculture as the dominant source of E. coli in southeastern Lake Huron. read more »
|
|
|
|
|
View All Blogs
|
|
|
|
|
|